Comments on: Up Your Price with Limited-Edition Photography

By: Kathryn

Kathryn — Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:23:26 +0000

I have a question regarding vintage prints, signing and numbering. If a photographer has vintage prints and ends up selling them years later, how should they be numbered and should they have a year of printing on them? It needs to be distinguished from a print that is printed today, of the same image. So for example, perhaps it is 1 of 3 vintage prints, printed in 1995, but when sold in 2011 it wasn't signed or numbered yet. So should it be signed with the current date, and a slash and then the edition and year it was printed, too? (i.e. signature 2011. 1/3 (edition) 1995 (vintage print date)
Thanks!

By: Gerry Mielke

Gerry Mielke — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:36:52 +0000

I am new at this. I photograph wildlife. I have a really neat picture of a Great Horned Owl close up. I have made 100 cards of this image. Can I make 80 limited edition prints of this photograph at 8x10 and another 80 of this of 11x14? If so, must the 80 photographs all be printed at the same time or can i use the same studio producing the same print as needed over time?

Thanks for your advice.

Gerry

By: Up Your Price with Limited-Edition Photography « David Gysel, Photographer, Images of Chile

Mon, 17 May 2010 13:06:05 +0000

[...] via Up Your Price with Limited-Edition Photography. [...]

By: Tim Leverett

Tim Leverett — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:43:54 +0000

Are you aware of any fine art photographers either currently or historically, that have limited their prints to one print? Making it much more like a painting and much more exclusive in terms of only one person being able to own it?

By: Terry Halsey

Terry Halsey — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:50:56 +0000

Anh:

I really like your last sentence.

By: Robert A. Lapiska

Robert A. Lapiska — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:23:12 +0000

Thank you for your insightful thoughts on creating limited edition works.