<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is a Verbal Agreement Sufficient for a Model Release?</title> <atom:link href="http://rising.blackstar.com/is-a-verbal-agreement-sufficient-for-a-model-release.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://rising.blackstar.com/is-a-verbal-agreement-sufficient-for-a-model-release.html</link> <description>Professional Photography Blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Scott Baradell</title><link>http://rising.blackstar.com/is-a-verbal-agreement-sufficient-for-a-model-release.html/comment-page-1#comment-5437</link> <dc:creator>Scott Baradell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:59:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=5153#comment-5437</guid> <description>Butch,Here&#039;s Carolyn&#039;s response to your question:&quot;Unfortunately, it&#039;s difficult to give a quick and easy answer to your situation because each circumstance is different and factors that you may not consider may be important to the analysis.  In short,  parties to a contract generally may not void a contract after it is consummated. Further, when a party performs in reliance of a contract, then the party is entitled to the benefit of the deal.&quot;Which seems to bring us back to whether the verbal agreement can be validated to begin with.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Butch,</p><p>Here's Carolyn's response to your question:</p><p>"Unfortunately, it's difficult to give a quick and easy answer to your situation because each circumstance is different and factors that you may not consider may be important to the analysis.  In short,  parties to a contract generally may not void a contract after it is consummated. Further, when a party performs in reliance of a contract, then the party is entitled to the benefit of the deal."</p><p>Which seems to bring us back to whether the verbal agreement can be validated to begin with.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: butch leitz</title><link>http://rising.blackstar.com/is-a-verbal-agreement-sufficient-for-a-model-release.html/comment-page-1#comment-5419</link> <dc:creator>butch leitz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:20:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=5153#comment-5419</guid> <description>Most savvy lawyers (including a couple I&#039;ve had as clients) and models &quot;know&quot; that the model release should be for specific photos from a specific shoot on a specific date. The release shouldn&#039;t be a blanket &quot;do what you want with any of them&quot; thing, but many are assumed to be that way. With so many mis-understandings about releases, it&#039;s easy to see why people just use a verbal agreement: it&#039;s easy. (but dangerous, and editors want signed releases anyway).My question would be: after a &quot;verbal agreement&quot; and photo swap and months or years gone by with photos from this shoot out in &quot;the world&quot;, would retracting verbal permission be valid since the photos would now be in the public?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most savvy lawyers (including a couple I've had as clients) and models "know" that the model release should be for specific photos from a specific shoot on a specific date. The release shouldn't be a blanket "do what you want with any of them" thing, but many are assumed to be that way. With so many mis-understandings about releases, it's easy to see why people just use a verbal agreement: it's easy. (but dangerous, and editors want signed releases anyway).</p><p>My question would be: after a "verbal agreement" and photo swap and months or years gone by with photos from this shoot out in "the world", would retracting verbal permission be valid since the photos would now be in the public?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tony Blei</title><link>http://rising.blackstar.com/is-a-verbal-agreement-sufficient-for-a-model-release.html/comment-page-1#comment-5388</link> <dc:creator>Tony Blei</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=5153#comment-5388</guid> <description>The company I use for commercial liability insurance requires having a history of having photographic subjects sign a release.  So I have a policy:  Everyone gets to sign a release.  Problem solved.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company I use for commercial liability insurance requires having a history of having photographic subjects sign a release.  So I have a policy:  Everyone gets to sign a release.  Problem solved.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will Seberger</title><link>http://rising.blackstar.com/is-a-verbal-agreement-sufficient-for-a-model-release.html/comment-page-1#comment-5380</link> <dc:creator>Will Seberger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:51:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=5153#comment-5380</guid> <description>Verbal agreements are completely useless in nearly every purpose I can think of.If it&#039;s important enough to wonder if verbal agreement is enough, it&#039;s important enough to get in writing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verbal agreements are completely useless in nearly every purpose I can think of.</p><p>If it's important enough to wonder if verbal agreement is enough, it's important enough to get in writing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ian campbell</title><link>http://rising.blackstar.com/is-a-verbal-agreement-sufficient-for-a-model-release.html/comment-page-1#comment-5379</link> <dc:creator>ian campbell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:13:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=5153#comment-5379</guid> <description>As Sam Goldwyn reportedly once said, a verbal contract isn&#039;t worth the paper it&#039;s printed on. Case proven, I&#039;d say.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Sam Goldwyn reportedly once said, a verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Case proven, I'd say.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 325/326 objects using disk: basic

Served from: rising.blackstar.com @ 2012-02-11 10:03:37 -->
