- Black Star Rising - http://rising.blackstar.com -
How the Library of Congress Screwed Up By Putting Its Photos on Flickr
Posted By Anh Stack On January 21, 2008 @ 9:00 pm In Legal Matters | 2 Comments
It’s been said that everyone and their uncle are putting their images on Flickr. That’s now become literally true. Uncle Sam has just uploaded some of his photographs on the photo-sharing Web site.
The Library of Congress has uploaded more than 3,000 photos from two of its most popular collections: The George Grantham Bain Collection  and American Memory: Color Photographs from the Great Depression .
According to a post on Flickr’s blog , the rationale behind the partnership is twofold:
firstly, to increase exposure to the amazing content currently held in the public collections of civic institutions around the world, and secondly, to facilitate the collection of general knowledge about these collections, with the hope that this information can feed back into the catalogues, making them richer and easier to search.
Normally, I’d be happy to support projects that let people see good images — and there are some fantastic photos in these collections. It’s the reasoning (and the choice of Flickr) that bother me.
If the Library of Congress Can’t Show Photos, Give Them to Flickr
I’m sure it’s true that since the photos were uploaded they’ve received a spike in the number of views, but these images are already available on the Library of Congress’ own Web site . That they have to be searched there rather than browsed, and that the search function is fiddly rather than user-friendly, isn’t a reason to turn to Flickr.
It’s a reason to sort out the design of the Library of Congress’ Web site. That wouldn’t just increase the exposure of these images; it would also increase the exposure of all the other items available in the library’s digital catalog.
It’s one thing to put the photos where photo admirers are already located, but if the Library of Congress had brought those photography fans to its own site with a well-designed gallery, it could have shown them the rest of its collection, too.
But the reason the library put the images on Flickr isn’t just that it wants people to see them. It also wants to use the community as free librarians. As the library’s blog  explains:
We want people to tag, comment and make notes on the images, just like any other Flickr photo, which will benefit not only the community but also the collections themselves. For instance, many photos are missing key caption information such as where the photo was taken and who is pictured. If such information is collected via Flickr members, it can potentially enhance the quality of the bibliographic records for the images.
And potentially damage the quality of the records, too. Flickr isn’t Wikipedia and photographs aren’t informational essays. The most common contribution by a Flickr member to a photograph isn’t to explain how the lighting could have been corrected or offer extra information about an image, but simply “Great capture”… and a hope that the photographer will look at and fave their images in return.
“Amazing Photo!”… Yawn
So far, that seems to be what’s happening with the Library of Congress’ images. Instead of someone saying, “Hey, that’s my great aunt Betty!” everyone is saying … you guessed it: “Amazing photo… great shot,” etc. In fact, rather than receiving information about its photos, the Library of Congress is supplying information by answering viewers’ questions about how the images were digitized.
Even the tagging seems to be getting out of hand. The image above by David Bransby  of a woman aircraft worker has received tags that range from “North American Aviation” to “woman,” “red,” and “blouse.” The problem with everyone becoming an editor is that no one is an editor.
Perhaps the most worrying aspect of all of this, though, is what effect it might have on the way users see rights. Flickr created a new rights tag for the Library of Congress’ images, one that goes beyond Creative Commons and All Rights Reserved. The photos are all described as having “No known copyright restrictions.”
That isn’t quite the same as not having any copyright restrictions, and do Flickr members really need yet another copyright rule — even if, like the others, they plan to ignore it?
[tags]Flickr, Library of Congress, photography, photo-sharing[/tags]
Article printed from Black Star Rising: http://rising.blackstar.com
URL to article: http://rising.blackstar.com/how-the-library-of-congress-screwed-up-by-putting-its-photos-on-f.html
URLs in this post:
 Tweet: https://twitter.com/share
 George Grantham Bain Collection: http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/sets/72157603624867509/
 American Memory: Color Photographs from the Great Depression: http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/sets/72157603671370361/
 Flickr’s blog: http://blog.flickr.com/2008/01/16/many-hands-make-light-work/
 Library of Congress’ own Web site: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/pp/fsacabt.html
 library’s blog: http://www.loc.gov/blog/
 David Bransby: http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/2179930812/in/set-72157603671370361/
Copyright © 2010 Black Star Rising. All rights reserved.