Comments on: Digital Photography and the Need for Speed http://rising.blackstar.com/digital-photography-and-the-need-for-speed.html Professional Photography Blog Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:56:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bryan grant photographyhttp://rising.blackstar.com/digital-photography-and-the-need-for-speed.html/comment-page-1#comment-22168 bryan grant photography Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:59:02 +0000 http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=4871#comment-22168 digital post processing should take longer then film because we now go threw each image by "hand" and apply more editing ourselves then leaving it up to a lab to do. digital post processing should take longer then film because we now go threw each image by "hand" and apply more editing ourselves then leaving it up to a lab to do.

]]> By: ThePortfolioProhttp://rising.blackstar.com/digital-photography-and-the-need-for-speed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5305 ThePortfolioPro Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:43:49 +0000 http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=4871#comment-5305 You bring up and interesting argument about Digital Photography and I agree with lots of your points. Quantity doesn't not equal Quality. It's an easy ratio. You bring up and interesting argument about Digital Photography and I agree with lots of your points. Quantity doesn't not equal Quality. It's an easy ratio.

]]> By: Will Sebergerhttp://rising.blackstar.com/digital-photography-and-the-need-for-speed.html/comment-page-1#comment-5299 Will Seberger Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:50:57 +0000 http://rising.blackstar.com/?p=4871#comment-5299 Sure, digital is in some ways faster. Mainly in the speed at which a photographer can go from camera to edit.But it, in my experience, does not allow for faster processing. Through a loupe or on-screen it can take time to find, crop and dust-spot images.Additionally, the digital era has ushered in a client-side concept that poor planning and weak subjects can be fixed in Photoshop. Somehow a boring, poorly lit conference room can be transformed into the Taj Mahal through the magic of electrons and silicon wafers.The same old rule applies: Good, fast, cheap. Pick any two. Sure, digital is in some ways faster. Mainly in the speed at which a photographer can go from camera to edit.

But it, in my experience, does not allow for faster processing. Through a loupe or on-screen it can take time to find, crop and dust-spot images.

Additionally, the digital era has ushered in a client-side concept that poor planning and weak subjects can be fixed in Photoshop. Somehow a boring, poorly lit conference room can be transformed into the Taj Mahal through the magic of electrons and silicon wafers.

The same old rule applies: Good, fast, cheap. Pick any two.

]]>